: :inin Kyiv (EET)

The US global intelligence company Stratfor explained the possible scenarios of the further Russia’s aggression toward Ukraine


The USA global intelligence company Stratfor in the video on its official website showed the Ukrainian territories that are occupied by pro-Russian terrorists:

“At the present time, Russian forces augmenting pro-Russia separatists are positioned in Crimea and southeastern Ukraine. Geographically, the area comprises rolling flat plains with no large-scale terrain features that can serve as anchors for military forces, except for the Dnieper River, running north south through central Ukraine.”

The initial Russia conducted small incursions along the entirety of its shared border with Ukraine. This effort was made to threaten various key objectives in the region and spread out Ukrainian combat power. And one more limited option is a small expansion of current terrorists’ lines to the north, including the rest of Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts:

“When looking broadly at Russia’s military course of action, Stratfor examined the limited options first. The initial scenario we considered was the most limited of them all. In this paradigm, Russia conducted small incursions along the entirety of its shared border with Ukraine in an effort to threaten various key objectives in the region and by doing so, spreading out Ukrainian combat power as much as possible. From the Russian military perspective, this is efficient and effective, but it wouldn’t realize any additional political or security objectives not already underway. However, such a move would likely be used in conjunction with any future military actions by Russia or pro-Russia separatists.”

“Another limited option is a small expansion of current Separatist lines to the north, incorporating the remainder of Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts to make the territory more self-sustaining. This offensive would mainly consist of direct engagement of Ukrainian forces that are concentrated along the separatist held area.”

There is a well known logical scenario that Russia wants the land corridor that can connect the self proclamed pro-Russian terrorist organizations with Crimea:

“One of the most commonly rumored options entails Russia driving along Ukraine’s southern coast to link up Crimea with separatist positions in eastern Ukraine. For this scenario it was assumed that planners would make the offensive front broad enough to secure Crimea’s primary water supply, sourced from the Dnieper. This water feature is significant because much of Russia’s defensive line would be anchored on the key defensible terrain in the region: namely, the Dnieper River. This would achieve a land bridge and secure supply lines into Crimea.”

“In conducting such an offensive, an initial thrust would move forces rapidly through Ukraine toward the city of Kherson and Nova Kakhovka on the Dnieper River, where they would set up defensive positions. One of the potential constraints to this scenario is the fact that lines of supply would extend for quite some distance along a thin, difficult to defend, stretch of land.”

One more possible scenario is that Russian Fedaration plans to grab the entire southern coast of Ukraine and have the connection in the breakaway region of Transdniestria:

“Another scenario that was considered involves seizing the entire southern coast of Ukraine to connect Russia and its security forces in the breakaway region of Transdniestria. The logic goes that this would cripple Kiev by cutting it off from the Black Sea, thereby securing all Russian interests in this region in a continual arc. This would require a complicated and dangerous bridging operation over a large river, with an extended and vulnerable logistics train.”

One of last scenarios is that Russia could seize all of eastern Ukraine up to the Dnipro River, controlling all of the main crossing points, and using the major obstacle of the River as the defensive front line. “Yet, taking this entire area would require a significant amount of forces moving into eastern Ukraine. The resulting occupation would also require a massive counter-insurgency campaign including operations in parts of Kiev, as well as the cities of Kharkiv, Dnepropetrovsk and others, where a high level of resistance would be expected.” – considers Stratfor.

UaPositon

UaPositon

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This

Share this post with your friends!